Spring Break
The G-Spot: Hypocrisy in the frog penis debate
Greg Elias
Issue date: 4/7/05 Section: Entertainment
If a blue frog with an external penis didn't exist, someone would have to create it. To xacknowledge a goggles and leather-wearing blue frog's fictional external penis as sexual imagery is absurd. Consider the implications of any ad that uses human sexuality to sell a product, and then think about how much the frog turned you on.
A funny way to bend your mind is to try to look at this optimistically, thinking maybe the complaints were scientific in nature. "A frog with an external penis is generally ridiculous. Please correct this danger to the public's collective knowledge of amphibians at once." That's the good of the people.
But it was probably someone with children who thought that frog should have had a real motorcycle. What really matters is that America has finally hit that wall where sexual imagery across the board is considered indecent, unless it proves successful for a major moneymaker. Thankfully, this concept will help crush the hopes of the frog tone breaking through across the pond.
Join arms with Janet Jackson and Nicolette Sheridan, naked frog. You're a cultural symbol.
A funny way to bend your mind is to try to look at this optimistically, thinking maybe the complaints were scientific in nature. "A frog with an external penis is generally ridiculous. Please correct this danger to the public's collective knowledge of amphibians at once." That's the good of the people.
But it was probably someone with children who thought that frog should have had a real motorcycle. What really matters is that America has finally hit that wall where sexual imagery across the board is considered indecent, unless it proves successful for a major moneymaker. Thankfully, this concept will help crush the hopes of the frog tone breaking through across the pond.
Join arms with Janet Jackson and Nicolette Sheridan, naked frog. You're a cultural symbol.
